Blogs - TrainingForce

Glen Tate Glen Tate

0 Course Enrolled • 0 Course Completed

Biography

Valid ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Test Sims & Reliable ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Test Simulator

Experts at PDFDumps have also prepared PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN practice exam software for your self-assessment. This is especially handy for preparation and revision. You will be provided with an examination environment and you will be presented with actual exam PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Exam Questions. This sort of preparation method enhances your knowledge which is crucial to excelling in the actual PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN certification exam.

PDFDumps offers real PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Questions that can solve this trouble for students. Professionals have made the PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN questions of PDFDumps after working days without caring about themselves to provide the applicants with actual ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN exam questions PDFDumps guarantees our customers that they can pass the PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor中文版) (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN) exam on the first try by preparing from PDFDumps, and if they fail to pass it despite their best efforts, they can claim their payment back according to some terms and conditions.

>> Valid ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Test Sims <<

Reliable ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Test Simulator, ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Latest Exam Forum

How to find a valid exam dumps providers which can elaborate on how to prepare you properly with more appropriate questions to pass ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN exams? Yes, here is your chance to know us. Our products are just suitable for you. Our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN exam training dumps will help you master the real test and prepare well for your exam. If you worry about your exam, our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Exam Training dumps will guide you and make you well preparing，you will pass exam without any doubt.

PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor中文版) Sample Questions (Q187-Q192):

NEW QUESTION # 187
審計結果是根據審計標準對收集的審計證據進行評估的結果。評估以下潛在的審計證據格式並選擇可接受的兩種。

A. 有關 IT 審核結果的記錄資訊
B. IT 經理的事實陳述
C. IT 經理與系統工程師之間對話的錄音
D. 觀察先前錄製的演示危險活動表現的視頻
E. 對測試結果進行未簽署的手寫更改
F. 系統工程師的言論，無法驗證

Answer: A,D

Explanation:
According to the ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam preparation guide1, audit evidence can be in various formats, such as records, statements of fact, or other information that is relevant and verifiable. Audit evidence can be collected by means of interviews, observation, sampling, testing, or other techniques. However, not all formats of audit evidence are acceptable or reliable. For example, unsigned hand written changes to test results (A) are not verifiable and may indicate tampering or falsification. Statements by a system engineer that cannot be verified (D) are also not reliable and may be biased or inaccurate. An audio recording of a dialog between the IT manager and a system engineer (F) may not be relevant to the audit criteria or may violate the confidentiality or consent of the parties involved. A statement of facts by the IT manager (B) may be relevant and verifiable, but it is not sufficient as audit evidence unless it is supported by other sources of information. Therefore, the two acceptable formats of audit evidence are documented information on results of IT audits and observation of a previously recorded video demonstrating the performance of a hazardous activity (E), as they are relevant to the audit criteria and can be verified by other means. Reference: 1: https://pecb.com/pdf/exam-preparation-guides/pecb-iso-iec-27001-lead-auditor-exam-preparation-guide.pdf (page 9)

NEW QUESTION # 188
情境 6：Sinvestment 是一家提供家庭保險、商業保險和人壽保險的保險公司。該公司成立於北卡羅來納州，但最近在其他地區進行了擴張，包括歐洲和非洲。
Sinvestment 致力於遵守適用於其行業的法律法規，並防止任何資訊安全事件。他們實施了基於 ISO/IEC 27001 的 ISMS 並申請了 ISO/IEC 27001 認證。
認證機構指派兩名審核員進行審核。與Sinvestment簽訂保密協議後。他們開始了審計活動。首先，他們審查了標準要求的文件，包括 ISMS 範圍聲明、資訊安全政策和內部稽核報告。審查過程並不容易，因為儘管 Sinvestment 表示他們已製定文件程序，但並非所有文件都具有相同的格式。
隨後，審計小組對Sinvestment的高階主管進行了多次訪談，以了解他們在ISMS實施中的作用。第一階段審計的所有活動都是遠端進行的，除了根據 Sinvestment 的要求在現場進行的文件資訊審查之外。
在此階段，審計人員發現沒有與資訊安全培訓和意識計劃相關的文件。被問及時，Sinvestment代表表示，公司已為所有員工提供資訊安全培訓課程。第一階段審計讓審計團隊對 Sinvestment 的營運和 ISMS 有了整體了解。
第二階段審核在第一階段審核三週後進行。審計小組觀察到，行銷部門（未包含在審計範圍內）沒有適當的程序來控制員工的存取權限。由於控制員工的存取權限是ISO/IEC 27001的要求之一，並且已包含在公司的資訊安全政策中，因此該問題包含在審計報告中。此外，在第二階段審計中，審計小組觀察到Sinvestment沒有記錄使用者活動日誌。
該公司的程序規定“記錄用戶活動的日誌應保留並定期審查”，但該公司沒有提供任何執行該程序的證據。
在所有審核活動中，審核員透過觀察、訪談、文件化資訊審查、分析和技術驗證來收集資訊和證據。對第一階段和第二階段的所有審核結果進行了分析，審核小組決定發布積極的認證建議。
在第一階段審核中，審核小組發現Sinvestment沒有資訊安全訓練和意識的記錄。在這種情況下，Sinvestment 會做什麼？請參閱場景 6。

A. 執行新的風險評估流程以了解問題是否需要修改
B. 記錄已識別的問題並在認證審核完成後進行更正
C. 在第 2 階段審核之前修正已識別的問題

Answer: C

Explanation:
Sinvestment should correct the identified issue related to the lack of documentation on information security training and awareness before the stage 2 audit. Addressing this gap promptly ensures that the ISMS is fully compliant and effective when assessed in the subsequent audit stage.
References: ISO/IEC 27001:2013, Clause 7.2 (Competence)

NEW QUESTION # 189
您正在一家提供醫療保健服務的住宅療養院進行 ISMS 審核。審核計畫的下一步是驗證資訊安全事件管理流程。 IT 安全經理介紹了資訊安全事件管理程序（文件參考 ID：ISMS_L2_16，版本 4），並解釋此流程基於 ISO/IEC 27035-1:2016。
您查看該文件並注意到一條聲明「任何資訊安全弱點、事件和事故應在識別後 1 小時內報告給聯絡人 (PoC)」。在訪問員工時，您發現大家對「弱點、事件、事件」意義的理解有差異。
IT安全經理解釋說，6個月前舉辦了一次線上「資訊安全應對」培訓研討會。所有受訪者均參與並通過了報告練習和課程評估。
您正在準備審計結果。選擇兩個正確的選項。

A. 存在不合格項 (NC)。事件管理報告流程的術語不明確，員工對「弱點、事件和事件」意義的誤解證明了這一點。這不符合第 9.1 條和控制措施 A.5.24。
B. 存在不合格項 (NC)。資訊安全事件培訓失敗。這不符合第 7.2 條和控制措施 A.6.3。
C. 還有改進的機會 (OFI)。提高資訊安全事件訓練效果。這與第 7.2 條和控制措施 A.6.3 相關。
D. 沒有不合格項。報告資訊安全弱點、事件和事故。
這符合第 9.1 條和控制措施 A.5.24。
E. 沒有不合格項。資訊安全處置訓練卓有成效。這符合第 7.2 條和控制措施 A.6.3。
F. 有改進的機會 (OFI)。報告資訊安全弱點、事件和事件。這與第 9.1 條和控制措施 A.5.24 有關。

Answer: A,C

Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022 clause 7.2, the organization must ensure that the persons doing work under its control are aware of the information security policy, their contribution to the effectiveness of the ISMS, the implications of not conforming to the ISMS requirements, and the benefits of improved information security performance. The organization must also provide information security awareness education and training to its personnel and relevant interested parties. According to control A.6.3, the organization must ensure that all employees and contractors are made aware of the information security incident management procedures and their expected roles and responsibilities. Therefore, an opportunity for improvement (OFI) can be identified if the information security incident training effectiveness can be improved, as evidenced by the differences in the understanding of the meaning of "weakness, event, and incident" among the staff.
According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022 clause 9.1, the organization must monitor, measure, analyze and evaluate the information security performance and the effectiveness of the ISMS. The organization must also retain appropriate documented information as evidence of the monitoring and measurement results. According to control A.5.24, the organization must establish and maintain an information security incident management process that includes the following activities:
*reporting information security events and weaknesses;
*assessing and deciding on information security events;
*responding to information security incidents;
*learning from information security incidents;
*collecting evidence and disclosing information.
Therefore, a nonconformity (NC) can be identified if the terminology of the incident management reporting process is unclear, as evidenced by the staff misunderstanding of the meaning of "weakness, event, and incident". This could lead to inconsistent or inaccurate reporting, assessment, response, learning, and disclosure of information security incidents, which could affect the information security performance and the effectiveness of the ISMS.
References:
*ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clauses 7.2, 9.1, and Annex A controls A.5.24 and A.6.3
*[PECB Candidate Handbook ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor], pages 15-16, 18-19, 22-23
*ISO/IEC 27035-1:2016, clauses 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8
*ISO 27001 - Annex A.16: Information Security Incident Management
*ISO 27001:2022 Annex A Control 5.24 - What's New?

NEW QUESTION # 190
為 ISMS 中的資訊安全風險評估流程選擇正確的順序。
要完成序列，請按一下要完成的空白部分，使其以紅色突出顯示，然後從下面的選項中按一下適用的文字。或者，您可以將選項拖曳到適當的空白處

Answer:

Explanation:

NEW QUESTION # 191
您是 ISMS 審核小組組長，由您的認證機構指派對客戶進行後續審核。您正在為此審核準備審核計畫。
下列哪兩項敘述是正確的？

A. 應先驗證糾正措施，然後是糾正措施，最後是改進機會
B. 驗證應專注於所採取的任何操作是否完成
C. 應先檢視糾正措施，然後是糾正，最後是改進機會
D. 驗證應重點關注所採取的任何行動是否有效
E. 驗證應重點關注所採取的任何行動是否有效
F. 應先驗證改進機會，然後再修正，最後採取糾正措施

Answer: B,E

Explanation:
According to ISO 27001:2022 clause 9.1.2, the organisation shall conduct internal audits at planned intervals to provide information on whether the information security management system conforms to the organisation' s own requirements, the requirements of ISO 27001:2022, and is effectively implemented and maintained12 According to ISO 27001:2022 clause 10.1, the organisation shall react to the nonconformities and take action, as applicable, to control and correct them and deal with the consequences. The organisation shall also evaluate the need for action to eliminate the causes of nonconformities, in order to prevent recurrence or occurrence.
The organisation shall implement any action needed, review the effectiveness of any corrective action taken, and make changes to the information security management system, if necessary12 A follow-up audit is a type of internal audit that is conducted after a previous audit to verify whether the nonconformities and corrective actions have been addressed and resolved, and whether the information security management system has been improved12 Therefore, the following statements are true for preparing a follow-up audit plan:
* Verification should focus on whether any action undertaken is complete. This means that the auditor should check whether the organisation has implemented all the planned actions to correct and prevent the nonconformities, and whether the actions have been documented and communicated as required12
* Verification should focus on whether any action undertaken has been undertaken effectively. This means that the auditor should check whether the organisation has achieved the intended results and objectives of the actions, and whether the actions have eliminated or reduced the nonconformities and their causes and consequences12 The following statements are false for preparing a follow-up audit plan:
* Verification should focus on whether any action undertaken has been undertaken efficiently. This is false because efficiency is not a criterion for verifying the actions taken to address the nonconformities and corrective actions. Efficiency refers to the optimal use of resources to achieve the desired outcomes, but it is not a requirement of ISO 27001:2022. The auditor should focus on the effectiveness and completeness of the actions, not on the efficiency12
* Corrections should be verified first, followed by corrective actions and finally opportunities for improvement. This is false because there is no prescribed order for verifying the corrections, corrective actions, and opportunities for improvement. The auditor should verify all the actions taken by the organisation, regardless of their sequence or priority. The auditor may choose to verify the actions based on their relevance, significance, or impact, but this is not a mandatory requirement12
* Opportunities for improvement should be verified first, followed by corrections and finally corrective actions. This is false because there is no prescribed order for verifying the opportunities for improvement, corrections, and corrective actions. The auditor should verify all the actions taken by the organisation, regardless of their sequence or priority. The auditor may choose to verify the actions based on their relevance, significance, or impact, but this is not a mandatory requirement12
* Corrective actions should be reviewed first, followed by corrections and finally opportunities for improvement. This is false because there is no prescribed order for reviewing the corrective actions, corrections, and opportunities for improvement. The auditor should review all the actions taken by the organisation, regardless of their sequence or priority. The auditor may choose to review the actions based on their relevance, significance, or impact, but this is not a mandatory requirement12 References:
1: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Auditor (Information Security Management Systems) Course by CQI and IRCA Certified Training 1 2: ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor Training Course by PECB 2

NEW QUESTION # 192
......

There are a lof of the advantages for you to buy our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN exam questions safely. First, our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN study braindumps are free from computer virus. You can download or install our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN study material without hesitation. Second, we will protect your private information. No other person or company will get your information from us. You won't get any telephone harassment or receiving junk E-mails after purchasing our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN training guide. You don't have to worry about anything with our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN learning quiz.

Reliable ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Test Simulator: https://www.pdfdumps.com/ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN-valid-exam.html

Can I Get Free Demo of PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN dumps, PECB Valid ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Test Sims We have the most up-to-date and accurate questions, correct answers reviewed by our experts and an awesome APP, First, the hit rate of ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN questions & answers is up to 100%, PECB Valid ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Test Sims There are some good advises and guidance which can help you to judge the validity, As you know, our Reliable ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Test Simulator - PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor中文版) exam questions and answers are comprehensive with specific analysis, which provides a good study guidance for you and allowing you to have a further understanding of the IT technology.

The Raw format, on the other hand, stores all the information ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN the image sensor captures, including the extra bit depth that improves the shadow and highlight details.

Creating and Organizing Notebooks, Can I Get Free Demo of PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Dumps, We have the most up-to-date and accurate questions, correct answers reviewed by our experts and an awesome APP.

Splendid ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Exam Materials: PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor中文版) Present You a brilliant Training Dump - PDFDumps

First, the hit rate of ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN questions & answers is up to 100%, There are some good advises and guidance which can help you to judge the validity, As you know, our PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor中文版) exam questions and answers are comprehensive with specific analysis, Valid ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Test Sims which provides a good study guidance for you and allowing you to have a further understanding of the IT technology.

Glen Tate Glen Tate

Biography

Quick Links

Resources

Support